A Simulation Study of the Auroral Particle Acceleration Process


A.Yajima and S.Machida

Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-01, JAPAN
E-mail: yajima@kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp


Introduction
Simulation Models
Results
Conclusion and Discussions
References

Introduction

Numbers of numerical simulations of auroral particle acceleration process have been performed in the last 20 years. Auroral particles are thought to be accelerated along the magnetic field line by many small electrostatic potential drops, called ``weak double layers", which are distributed along the magnetic field line in the auroral zone. The field-aligned current excites the electrostatic ion-acoustic waves, and the weak double layers are formed as a result of nonlinear development of the ion-acoustic waves. Thus, particle electrostatic codes are suitably adopted in studying such an instability due to velocity space nonequilibrium. Those simulations are usually one-dimensional, since it has an advantage that we can put many grids along the magnetic field line and many particles in each grid.

A potential drop of the weak double layer was observed with a localized density depletion in the background plasma ions. This fact is consistent with simulation results that the weak double layer is an ion hole in the ion phase space. The growth and movement of ion holes are synchronized with the behavior of weak double layers [Barnes, 1985; Tetreault, 1991]. Ion holes were formed in the stationary ion, but the upflowing ion is usually observed in the auroral acceleration region [Koskinen,1990]. Effects of this component must be studied. Gray et al.[1991] studied this hot upflowing ion by numerical simulation, but electrons were stationary which did not compose the field-aligned current. In our study, upward field-aligned current consists of both shifted Maxwellian electrons and upflowing ions.

<top><Introduction><Simulation Models><Results>
<Conclusion and Discussions><References>


Simulation Models

We performed two types of numerical simulation, two component model and three component models. Both of simulations were studied with aperiodic one dimensional electrostatic particle code.

Two Component Model

The two component model includes hot shifted Maxwellian electron which carries upward field-aligned current, and stationary cold ion. We set the value of ion to electron temperature ratio as well as the electron drift velocity to cause the ion acoustic instability.

Three Component Model

The difference between this model and aforementioned ``two component" model is the presence of an upflowing ion beam component. A field-aligned upflowing ion beam is commonly observed in the auroral particle acceleration region by satellite, but the existence of such a component was not taken into account in the two component model. In the three component model, we assumed hot electrons, cold ions, and hot ions which represent upflowing ion of our initial conditions.

Parameters and Initial Condition

The plasma parameters for our simulation are
in two component model in three component model and .

Other simulation parameters are: (system length) (spatial grid) (time step) and where is the Debye length and is the electron plasma frequency.

We present four cases of simulation, run1 is the two component model, run2, run3 and run4 are the three component model. Fig.1 shows parameters and initial velocity distribution function for those four cases.

Boundary Condition

In our model, the system was set to be charge neutral, and both boundaries have equal values of electric field. We fixed this value to be zero, because it is necessary for simulation system to have net electrostatic potential drop between both boundaries. Particle boundary condition is a modified periodic condition. Particles out of one boundary are reinjected into the simulation system from the other boundary with shifted-Maxwellian velocity distribution. Drift velocity of each component is calculated by averaging velocity of the particles in one grid at the boundary. Using this boundary condition, one boundary does not affect the other boundary even if the region near the boundary contains beam-like accelerated particles.

<top><Introduction><Simulation Models><Results>
<Conclusion and Discussions><References>



Results

run1 (Two component model)

Many weak double layers were formed and vanished successively in the two component model. This process was also observable as an ion hole movement in the ion phase space. Ion hole was formed at the same velocity of the ion sound speed initially, then it was accelerated by potential drop owing to the charge layer around ion hole. Subsequently, ion hole left across cold ion in ion phase space in accordance with the disappearance of the potential drop. Ion acoustic solitary wave forming this weak double layer propagates downward and construct next weak double layer. Total potential drop was maintained by repetition of such a process. We call the weak double layer formed in this case type1 weak double layer.

run2 (Three component model)


As seen in the previous model, many weak double layers were formed and vanished successively in the three component model as well. However, a major difference between the two models is the life time of an ion hole, that is, the ion hole existed longer in this system where the ion beam was assumed than in a system where it was absent.

run3 and run4 (Three component model)


A important difference from run1 and run2 is the simultaneous existence of other type of weak double layer. Ion hole was formed at the same velocity of the ion sound speed of hot ion slow mode initially. We call this type of weak double layer having upward velocity initially type2 weak double layer.

The results of this model indicate that a theory of weak double layer formation incorporating the ion hole as demonstrated in the former model is also applicable to this model. Consequently, the total potential drop can grow in the present model more than in the previous model.

Fig.2 shows movement of two types of weak double layer in ion phase space.

<top><Introduction><Simulation Models><Results>
<Conclusion and Discussions><References>



Conclusion and Discussions

Type1 weak double layer causes an acceleration of ion beam, and the ion acoustic wave of slow beam mode is excited, followed by formation of type2 weak double layer. A single weak double layer can act positively to produce more weak double layers in higher altitudes through the effect of ion beam. Fig.3 shows such process schematically.

<top><Introduction><Simulation Models><Results>
<Conclusion and Discussions><References>



References


Gray, P. C., M. K. Hudson, W. Lotko, and R. Bergmann,
Decay of Ion Beam Driven Acoustic Waves into Ion Holes,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 18,1675,1991

Koskinen, H. E. J., R. Lundin, and B. Holdback,
On the plasma environment of solitary waves and weak double layers,
J. Geophys. Res., 95,5921,1990

Tetreault, D. J.,
Theory of electric fields in the auroral acceleration region,
J. Geophys. Res., 96,3549,1991

<top><Introduction><Simulation Models><Results>
<Conclusion and Discussions><References>